I have detested that woman ever since she was education secretary. She went on about how we have a great education system and then sent her child to private school. Fair enough. But instead of admitting it she tried to say it was due to his special needs.
Why do Labour want to get rid of grammar schools but still think it's ok to send their precious ones to private school? They try to put the spin on that grammar schools are elitist, for the rich only, yet my family wasn't rich and I went to Lancaster Grammar. At least grammars are free. So it's ok for Ruth Kelly to send her kids to a fee paying school, but we shouldn't send our bright children to (free) grammar schools.
And as road tax - just don't get me started! I'll end up suspended again, and I don't think tricking yahoo will work twice...
:-)
No labour pains yet. You'll have to ask a question on tax increases - that'll get the contractions started!
|