England Forum - UK Forum
 

Go Back   England Forum - UK Forum > Politics, Law and Corruption > Law Forum

 

 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008
Peon
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Default In UK laws if a DWP doctor underscores a medical assesment on purpose have I

got a case? They say because I cannot give them my doctors diagnosis then I have no claim against the DWP doctor.

Would I therefore have a case against the NHS for not giving me a specific name for the condition I am complaining of given the fact this has gone on for a few years ie, could or should they have conducted deeper tests quicker.

Thanks in advance to sensible answers.....
In my opinion this underscore was a direct result of the governments new guidance to remove people from incapacity benifit.

my doctor has now sent me to a hospital department who state i do not need surgery, they in turn sent me to physio who have just said the pain is due to my neck and lower back muscles closing down.

Im not a benifit cheat im just in agony and i am having to prove to much myself its just not fare now my incapasity benifit has been stopped. ps i have worked as an elderly care assistant and gone back a few time trying to work but the pain is just to much and my streangth is somewhere otherthan with me....
I have osteopenia that has been confirmed but that does not cause pain I agree however the next step is ostyoperosis which i think is whats causing the pain but my doctor says im to young to get ostyoperosis but I have read case younger than me suffering from the condition so he hasent sent me for those tests. i am 32 but small framed and do only look about 17 ostyoperosis does also affect small framed people like myself.
Thanks everyone all advice is welcomed, I have my friend typing as even the keyboard starts my neck off im so hurting.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

As already said, the assessing doctor has nothing to gain or lose from what you score. He is employed to assess you and put in a report to the DWP, and that's what he'll do. He's not there to diagnose your condition but assess what you can and cannot do.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008
Peon
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Dont think your giving us the full facts herebut if you want good advice go to the C.A.B.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008
Peon
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Why would they do it on purpose?

There are very few problems out there that have no name.

Maybe your doctor just cannot find anything wrong with you?

As already answered, any doctors or consultants opinions are sought before your assessment. The assesing Dr has nothing to gain from underscoring you - they are not on some kind of target bonus.

If your own doctor thought you had something serious, tests would have been performed earlier on.

I can sense that you think everyone is against you but I'm sure that's not the case. The DWP need to cut down on people claiming Incapacity Benefit therefore if you are fit for work (even if it is not your normal job) then it is there job to say so.

Good luck
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008
Peon
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3
Default

Your doctor must have written something on your sicknotes! When you are called in for medical with the DWP they usually contact your Doctor too. Someone must know the name of condition/s.

Appeal against the decision.!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008
Peon
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Default

This is a difficult question to answer - primarily because you don't say why you can't give the DWP your Doctors' diagnosis.

Has he actually made a concrete diagnosis or is he diagnosing? Either of these could lead to the response you mention - as the DWP are sticklers for "doting the i's and crossing the t's" , so to speak.

When you say "underscores" - do you mean as a finality to diagnosis? His diagnosis may be finalised but you do have a right of appeal - and i know of cases where this has occurred and persons have won.

The point to raise on having a specific named condition may be simply that with the little information the DWP Doctor has on your symptoms he is unable to name a condition - your symptoms may be covered by a number of illnesses or you have not enough symptoms by which to name any illness.

My advice is this - return to your Doctor for a proper diagnosis and if this not forthcoming, seek a second opinion which you are well within your rights to do so.
Once you have a concrete diagnosis from a General Practitioner you will find it easier to get a diagnosis from the DWP Doctor. But first - appeal against the decision of the DWP Doctor.
This is because the appeal process can take up to 6 months or more. Then see your Doctor and/or get a second opinion to get a diagnosis. This diagnosis you can then take to the appeal as proof of your condition.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Sedo - Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites project info: englanddebate.co.uk Statistics for project englanddebate.co.uk etracker® web controlling instead of log file analysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213